<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Bill 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatebill.org</link>
	<description>Climate Bill - US Cap &#38; Trade Bill 2009: American Clean Energy and Securities Act - Waxman-Markey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:47:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brechner</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Brechner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-142</guid>
		<description>To Jesse Jenkins, I see your point on the implication that Cap and Trade will not work for Acid Rain, but I am confused to what you think is the solution. If your toilet has clogged up before and now it has clogged up again, will you keep using it even if you think repair is a waste of time and money? Innovation alone will not be nearly enough, some companies need to be forced to change. At www.tlcearth.org we research equipment that uses trash to produce a clean burning fuel(methane), but who really cares? I have learned that most of us do not want to do anything about the mess in our restroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jesse Jenkins, I see your point on the implication that Cap and Trade will not work for Acid Rain, but I am confused to what you think is the solution. If your toilet has clogged up before and now it has clogged up again, will you keep using it even if you think repair is a waste of time and money? Innovation alone will not be nearly enough, some companies need to be forced to change. At <a href="http://www.tlcearth.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.tlcearth.org</a> we research equipment that uses trash to produce a clean burning fuel(methane), but who really cares? I have learned that most of us do not want to do anything about the mess in our restroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Hitech e Scienza - Panorama.it</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Hitech e Scienza - Panorama.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#38;raquo Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Gregtecnologia</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>&#38;raquo Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Gregtecnologia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hey windbabe,

Thanks for bringing that up. I put together this site in a hurry as a compliment to my @climatebill twitter account. I just wanted to create a hub for information on the bill.

I&#039;ll add a section to this page about me now. Thanks for bringing up this oversight. My apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey windbabe,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing that up. I put together this site in a hurry as a compliment to my @climatebill twitter account. I just wanted to create a hub for information on the bill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add a section to this page about me now. Thanks for bringing up this oversight. My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windbabe</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>windbabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I want to like this website, but I find it hard to trust a site that says nothing about the writer/owner and spells the name of the Waxman-Markley bill wrong... even though that is the whole focus of the website...  Who are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to like this website, but I find it hard to trust a site that says nothing about the writer/owner and spells the name of the Waxman-Markley bill wrong&#8230; even though that is the whole focus of the website&#8230;  Who are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I gotta say, the implication here that Cap and Trade worked for Acid Rain so it will work to completely transform our global energy supply and stop climate change is pretty much B.S.  See this post for a quick explanation of why: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebreakthrough.org/blog/2009/05/cap_and_trade_worked_for_acid.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cap and Trade Worked for Acid Rain, Why Not for Climate Change?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say, the implication here that Cap and Trade worked for Acid Rain so it will work to completely transform our global energy supply and stop climate change is pretty much B.S.  See this post for a quick explanation of why: &#8220;<a href="http://www.thebreakthrough.org/blog/2009/05/cap_and_trade_worked_for_acid.shtml" rel="nofollow">Cap and Trade Worked for Acid Rain, Why Not for Climate Change?&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
