<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Climate Bill - US Cap &amp; Trade Bill 2009: American Clean Energy and Securities Act - Waxman-Markey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatebill.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatebill.org</link>
	<description>Climate Bill - US Cap &#38; Trade Bill 2009: American Clean Energy and Securities Act - Waxman-Markey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:47:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Bill 101 by Brechner</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Brechner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-142</guid>
		<description>To Jesse Jenkins, I see your point on the implication that Cap and Trade will not work for Acid Rain, but I am confused to what you think is the solution. If your toilet has clogged up before and now it has clogged up again, will you keep using it even if you think repair is a waste of time and money? Innovation alone will not be nearly enough, some companies need to be forced to change. At www.tlcearth.org we research equipment that uses trash to produce a clean burning fuel(methane), but who really cares? I have learned that most of us do not want to do anything about the mess in our restroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jesse Jenkins, I see your point on the implication that Cap and Trade will not work for Acid Rain, but I am confused to what you think is the solution. If your toilet has clogged up before and now it has clogged up again, will you keep using it even if you think repair is a waste of time and money? Innovation alone will not be nearly enough, some companies need to be forced to change. At <a href="http://www.tlcearth.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.tlcearth.org</a> we research equipment that uses trash to produce a clean burning fuel(methane), but who really cares? I have learned that most of us do not want to do anything about the mess in our restroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greetings from the DC Action Factory tent city! by Rainer Palmstorfer</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/2009/08/25/greetings-from-the-dc-action-factory-tent-city/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Palmstorfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?p=233#comment-91</guid>
		<description>To whom it may concern,

I am an Austrian academic doing some research on environmentally-induced migration (ie &quot;climate refugees&quot;) to the US/EU. I was wondering whether or not US Congress has already dealt with this topic. If so, are there any offical documents (speeches, notes, policy papers) showing the US positions on this issue freely accessible?

best regards, Rainer Palmstorfer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whom it may concern,</p>
<p>I am an Austrian academic doing some research on environmentally-induced migration (ie &#8220;climate refugees&#8221;) to the US/EU. I was wondering whether or not US Congress has already dealt with this topic. If so, are there any offical documents (speeches, notes, policy papers) showing the US positions on this issue freely accessible?</p>
<p>best regards, Rainer Palmstorfer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by marrapz</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>marrapz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=2#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Do you support a climate treaty that involves sending 1% of U.S. GDP to developing countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you support a climate treaty that involves sending 1% of U.S. GDP to developing countries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Bill 101 by Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Hitech e Scienza - Panorama.it</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Hitech e Scienza - Panorama.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Bill 101 by &#38;raquo Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Gregtecnologia</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>&#38;raquo Clima: negli Usa avanzano i negazionisti - Gregtecnologia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Negli Usa intanto i lavori della commissione Ambiente del Senato che sta per esaminare il disegno di legge sul clima sono ostacolati dall&#8217;incessante lavoro delle lobby che hanno interesse a mantenere lo status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by WeatherSeeker</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>WeatherSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=2#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I simply want to say, &quot;Hurray! Let&#039;s make it happen.&quot;  And, ask, how do we counteract the nay sayer Energy Citizens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply want to say, &#8220;Hurray! Let&#8217;s make it happen.&#8221;  And, ask, how do we counteract the nay sayer Energy Citizens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fear of carbon markets is bipartisan. by footprintzero</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/2009/07/31/fear-of-carbon-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>footprintzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?p=195#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, it drives me nuts to hear people bitch about a well-regulated carbon market because a bunch of idiots were irresponsible with wholly unregulated OTC products the last 10 years.  The key is to have strong regulation and enforce it.  I spent 2000 words ripping Peter DeFazio on my blog for criticizing the Krugman piece you cite.

I also think they should forbid financial institutions with off-balance sheet exposure from participating in the new market and consider setting up federal clearinghouse organizations on which to trade carbon products.  I could go on forever about this.

Glad you brought up that jackass Barrasso as well, after his rant about organized crime dominating carbon offsets nothing he ever says again will surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, it drives me nuts to hear people bitch about a well-regulated carbon market because a bunch of idiots were irresponsible with wholly unregulated OTC products the last 10 years.  The key is to have strong regulation and enforce it.  I spent 2000 words ripping Peter DeFazio on my blog for criticizing the Krugman piece you cite.</p>
<p>I also think they should forbid financial institutions with off-balance sheet exposure from participating in the new market and consider setting up federal clearinghouse organizations on which to trade carbon products.  I could go on forever about this.</p>
<p>Glad you brought up that jackass Barrasso as well, after his rant about organized crime dominating carbon offsets nothing he ever says again will surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Bill 101 by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hey windbabe,

Thanks for bringing that up. I put together this site in a hurry as a compliment to my @climatebill twitter account. I just wanted to create a hub for information on the bill.

I&#039;ll add a section to this page about me now. Thanks for bringing up this oversight. My apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey windbabe,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing that up. I put together this site in a hurry as a compliment to my @climatebill twitter account. I just wanted to create a hub for information on the bill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add a section to this page about me now. Thanks for bringing up this oversight. My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Bill 101 by windbabe</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/climate-bill-101/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>windbabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/?page_id=18#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I want to like this website, but I find it hard to trust a site that says nothing about the writer/owner and spells the name of the Waxman-Markley bill wrong... even though that is the whole focus of the website...  Who are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to like this website, but I find it hard to trust a site that says nothing about the writer/owner and spells the name of the Waxman-Markley bill wrong&#8230; even though that is the whole focus of the website&#8230;  Who are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on @climatebill Twitter Updates for 2009-06-27 by Arlene LaHera</title>
		<link>http://climatebill.org/2009/06/27/climatebill-twitter-updates-for-2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene LaHera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatebill.org/2009/06/27/climatebill-twitter-updates-for-2009-06-27/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Please support this bill. Don&#039;t let it be about money or what any other country is doing. It is about integrity &amp; do we have it or not? Without some incentive no matter how small, (as this is) big business has no reason not to pollute. If you have children...please pass this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please support this bill. Don&#8217;t let it be about money or what any other country is doing. It is about integrity &amp; do we have it or not? Without some incentive no matter how small, (as this is) big business has no reason not to pollute. If you have children&#8230;please pass this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
